The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent Thesis Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words

The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent - dissertation ExampleThe doctrine of judicial preceding(prenominal) has undergone profound transformations from Eighteenth century onwards in conformism with the changing world. It is non a static concept but constantly evolving. Hence, the difficulty to grasp the relevance and scope of the doctrine of judicial occasion within the English legal system arises. In another(prenominal) words, since the doctrine of judicial antecedent is a dynamic concept in both theory and practice, it incessantly redefines its relationship with the legal system as a whole. There is a balance of power amongst the doctrine of precedent and other provisions in the legal system. Therefore, we need to examine some of the weighty aspects of English legal system that are closely related to the doctrine of judicial precedent such(prenominal) as the hierarchy of courts, parliament sovereignty, the ideologies of judicial adjudication and so on in order to locate the spare-time activity of precedents correctly. The doctrine of judicial precedent is intrinsically interpretative. Methodologically, hermeneutic blast would be appropriate to grasp the interpretative nature of precedents and as a doctrine its flexible relationship with the overall legal system. ... Certainly, a conjuncture-level analysis would not always necessarily collection the centrality of the doctrine of judicial precedent within the English level system. However, a highest-level abstraction of the English legal system based on its trajectory of evolution and development would show that the doctrine of judicial precedent is at the heart of English legal system.As an idea in general, precedent is not confined with jurisprudence or legal practice. Usually, all sorts of people resort to experiences to guide their arrange actions. It is an instant help in resolving complex issues by virtue of lived in experience. In addition, credit on precedent helps the evolution and codifica tion of ideas which otherwise would have been left forgotten in the annals of history. Thus, looking at the past for precedent is also an act of developing a theoretical approach towards it. While exploring the dynamics of the law of primitive man, Hoebel (1964) points out that the doctrine of judicial precedent is not a sole property of the Anglo-American Common Law System. Rather, primitive law also builds on precedents, for there too, saucy decisions rest on old rules of law or norms of custom, and new decisions which are sound tend to leave the foundations of future action (Hoebel, 1964, p. 28). Historically, it is the reproduction Euro-centric, colonial point of view to argue that the doctrine of judicial precedent seems to be (nearly) absent in all legal systems other than English legal system. The idea of precedent is present in almost all the operational legal systems for the simple reason that it cannot be otherwise. Nevertheless, the horizontal surface of the influence of the precedent may vary from system to system.